HomeOpinionLTE e-Bike vs Vehicle on Main St

LTE e-Bike vs Vehicle on Main St

Published on

Dear Chairman Herr,

As an inveterate reader of the Hopkinton Police Log, I couldn’t help but notice this entry: “12:01 p.m. A caller reported a 13-year-old on an e-bike ran into the caller’s vehicle and was shaken up. Officer Nicholas Walker responded and took a report.”

As many will know, such a car vs bike entry will catch my eye and this one left me with many unanswered questions; I requested a copy of Officer Walker’s report. It was quite revealing. The caller was driving easterly on Main St and making a left turn into the alleyway between Town Hall and Bill’s Pizza.

Anyone who drives knows that left turns on two-way streets are the scene of many an accident. The left-turning caller, rightfully, would be focused on on-coming traffic. Hidden behind cars parked at the curb in front of Town Hall, was the e-bike-riding 13-year-old, also east-bound, up hill, on the sidewalk!

This despite there being a usable, “perfectly safe” ‘bike lane’ across the street. (There is a 50+’ skid mark left by the e-bike riders attempt to stop! He was, reportedly “…flying up the sidewalk…”)

Mass Gen Laws, Chap 85, Section 11B “… and (3) bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks outside [emphasis mine] business districts…”. (The e-bike rider also violated Ed’s First Rule of survival for bikers, ‘Be where you are expected to be.’) … Violations … may be punished by a fine… …a bicycle operated by a person under 18 in violation … may be impounded by the police department…

The motorist is making a left turn into one of the commercial driveways crossing the bike lane. As the driveway continues across the bike lane at road-grade level, the motorist will not receive the slightest clue they are crossing ‘something’.

Quoting from the Massachusetts Planning and Design Guide:

On streets with two-way traffic flow, the operational dynamic of a motorist looking for gaps in traffic creates unique challenges that cannot be resolved strictly through the provision of parking restrictions to improve sight distance.

This is a challenging maneuver because the motorist is primarily looking for gaps in oncoming traffic and is less likely to scan for bicyclists approaching from behind.

Unlike for Case A or Case B on one-way streets where the motorist is decelerating towards the crossing, the motorist in this instance will be accelerating towards the crossing once they perceive a gap in traffic. This creates a higher potential for conflict on streets with high traffic volumes…

RAISED CROSSINGS

Raised crossing are an effective strategy for reducing crashes between motorists and bicyclists because they slow the turning speed of motor vehicles, increase visibility of vulnerable street users, and increase yielding behavior of motorists.

Raised crossings should be considered for separated bike lane crossings where motorists are required to yield the right-of-way to bicyclists while turning or crossing. Examples where this treatment may be particularly beneficial are at the following types of crossings: Driveways and alleys…

Rightly concentrating on the on-coming traffic, and with the 13-year-old again hidden from view behind the parked cars, BUT now heading downhill on grades approaching 6%, thusly likely picking up speed before the collision; well, you can draw your own conclusions.

Sincerely,
Ed Harrow

Latest articles

Catch up with a briefing of the most important and interesting stories from Hopkinton delivered to your inbox.

12 COMMENTS

  1. In most towns, bikes aren’t allowed on the sidewalks. This is even more reason that a bike lane should be marked out on the roadway, separate from motor vehicle traffic to the far right. Look at the town of Upton, bike lane in the roadway with a separate lane for bikes not included or more importantly confused with a sidewalk.

  2. Indeed. That was one of several edits to my letter:

    Mass Gen Laws, Chap 85, Section 11B, “and (3) bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks OUTSIDE [emphasis mine] business districts…”

    I regret that confusion.

  3. The town should eliminate the truly idiotic new bike lanes, widen the roadways for emergency vehicles and paint in a new bike lane.

  4. The notion of an “e-bike” being referred to as a “bicycle” is ludicrous. These things are more like mini motorcycles that kids of any age are now allowed to “drive”. I was out walking with my lovely wife on a quiet neighborhood street near the middle / high school complex. School had just let out, and we saw a kid zipping along on an electric skateboard. He was actually speeding. He was going 30 mph in a 25 mph zone. He was traveling down the middle of the street. No helmet. No knee pads. Nothing but a backpack which probably had his school books and homework that he won’t be able to do when he crashes his scooter at 30 mph and suffers brain damage. These e-bikes and scooters are a severe danger to the public. I am old, legally blind, and walk with a cane. I am terrified of reckless people on e-bikes, e-scooters, and e-skateboards who think nothing of speeding along the sidewalk.

    • “These things are more like mini motorcycles”

      That’s a gross generalization. Most ebikes are pedal-assist, meaning you have to pedal to make it move. Most also are speed-limited to around 20 mph.

      Unfortunately, there are some with throttles, some don’t even bother with pedals, some can have their speed limiter hacked or changed by an app, and some are like you said – actually motorcycles.

      Years ago, there were classifications defined for ebikes, but a number of ebikes currently available blow those classifications away. It’s a mess.

      Anyways, my point is that not all ebikes are monsters.

  5. Hoppy, the horse is outa the barn here. The problem can not be fixed by Hopkinton. Hopefully the legislature will wake up and see what they have wrought, and at least make an attempt to rein it in.

    The envolved 13-year-old hit the car because he lacked the skill and knowledge required. All evidence points to his failure to use the front
    brake. That, of course is on top of his speeding up the sidewalk in a business district.

    The night i contemplated the skidmark while awaiting our BlueSquare order, an adult on an Ebike, followed by a child on a pedal bike, crossed Main St from the library side, and rode down the side walk. I pointed out that bikes don’t belong on the sidewalk. He was unconcerned.

  6. I run the Ashland Bike Club now in its 12th year. Most of our members are in their 60s, 70s, and even well into their 80s. We have riders from Hopkinton who are in their 70s and 80s and many of them use e-bikes on our club rides. They wouldn’t be able to ride with the club on a standard pedal bike. It’s important not to “throw the baby out with the bath water.”

    The criticisms raised by Ed and other commenters are fully justified. There’s a serious problem here that needs to be addressed immediately.

    For starters, there needs to be far better safety education not just about e-bikes but about bicycling in general. Bike riders need instruction and so do automobile drivers. There is virtually no education being provided by state and local governments to improve bicycle safety. This needs to change.

    The introduction of e-bikes was done with a painful lack of policy consideration. The federal government provided three “classes” of e-bikes. In my view, they should have only allowed one. Class 1 must be pedaled to go and the battery assist cuts out at 20 mph. The cut-off should have happened at 15 mph. Class 2 e-bikes are an abomination. They do NOT need to be pedaled to go. Because they can go without pedaling, they are NOT bicycles. Class 2 e-bikes should be banned unless they are used by mobility-challenged persons. And Class 3 e-bikes provide a battery assist up to 28 mph. That is NOT a safe speed for most people to ride a bicycle. These, too, should be banned or they should require licensing, registration, and insurance coverage.

    And one last thing about e-bikes …

    High e-bike speeds are not just a problem on sidewalks; they are a problem on bike paths as well. Bike paths, aka multi-use paths, are commonly used by both pedestrians and bike riders in very close proximity. For the safety of all, it is critical for bike riders to slow down when other path users are present. This is especially true for e-bikes that often weigh 3 to 4 times the weight of a standard bicycle. A heavy e-bike traveling at a high rate of speed on a narrow path could cause major injuries (or worse) to a pedestrian or another bike rider. Put these in the hands of children who lack the necessary maturity and who have had no driver training, and the risks are greatly magnified.

    E-bikes can be a blessing if they are used safely. They can help address our climate issues, provide an alternate source of transportation, and provide recreation to many people who otherwise would not use a bicycle. Policy-makers have allowed a technology with great potential to “go public” with a serious lack of education and poorly conceived regulations. The e-bike crisis urgently needs to be remedied. In every sense, this is very much a matter of life and death.

    Ashland Bike Club

  7. Thank you Joel! An excellent analysis of a complex situation, likely the result of limited understanding by those who setup the Ebike standards in the first place.

  8. I have witnessed over the past 10 years many instances of both e-bikes, mini-motor cycles & scooters driving where they should NOT be and in a manner which is not acceptable to the operation of a motor vehicle. Where none of these occurrences did not directly involve me, I have failed to write both local and state legislators about incidents reported and overall danger to citizens around the state, including both children who may be victims of reckless driving accidents and those who caused the accident. I encourage anyone who feels that these vehicles are dangerous to the majority of citizens who drive on our streets and walk on our sidewalks should write your legislators and ask them to take action to correct the mistakes made in holes within the legislation passed to protect ALL citizens.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More like this